Cardiac Conduction Axis in Perimembranous VSD

Normal Anatomy and Surgical Implications of Outlet and Inlet Extension

Understanding the atrioventricular conduction axis is essential for safe ventricular septal defect closure. In perimembranous VSDs, the conduction tissue is not merely “near the posterior-inferior rim.” Its exact relationship to the defect depends on the morphology of the VSD, the extension of the defect into the inlet or outlet septum, and the configuration of the trabecula septomarginalis.

The most important surgical concept is that the right bundle branch is not fixed in a single predictable location. In the normal heart, it follows a relatively consistent course in relation to the muscle of Lancisi. In perimembranous VSDs, however, this relationship can be modified substantially by the direction of septal deficiency. Outlet extension and inlet extension create different three-dimensional relationships between the VSD margin, the branching bundle, the RBB, the medial papillary muscle, and the posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis [1, 2].

For the surgeon, this means that conduction injury is prevented not by memorizing one landmark, but by interpreting the morphology of the defect before placing sutures.

1. Normal Cardiac Conduction Axis

In the normal heart, the cardiac conduction system begins at the atrioventricular node, located within the atrioventricular septal region near the apex of the triangle of Koch. From the AV node, the penetrating bundle passes through the central fibrous body and enters the crest of the interventricular septum. It then continues as the branching bundle before dividing into the left and right bundle branches [3].

The normal sequence is:

1. AV node
2. Penetrating bundle
3. Non-branching bundle
4. Branching bundle
5. Bifurcating bundle
6. Left and right bundle branches

The left bundle branch fans out along the left ventricular septal surface. The right bundle branch becomes surgically relevant on the right ventricular side, where it emerges onto the RV septal surface and courses toward the trabecular septum and moderator band.

In a normal heart without VSD, the RBB typically emerges on the RV septal surface posterior to the muscle of Lancisi, which is closely related to the medial papillary muscle complex and the trabecula septomarginalis [1]. This normal relationship provides the baseline for understanding how the RBB may be displaced in perimembranous VSDs.

2. Perimembranous VSD and the Conduction Axis

A perimembranous VSD is defined by fibrous continuity between the defect and the central fibrous body. Because the conduction axis penetrates through this region, the penetrating and branching portions of the conduction system are vulnerable during surgical closure.

Classically, the AV conduction axis is described as running along the posteroinferior margin of a perimembranous VSD. This is a useful general rule, but it is incomplete. The actual position of the conduction axis depends on the subtype of the defect and its extension into adjacent septal components [3].

Important modifiers include:

• Outlet extension
• Inlet extension
• Trabecular extension
• Configuration of the posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis
• Position of the medial papillary muscle
• Presence or absence of muscular tissue between the defect rim and the conduction axis

Modern high-resolution imaging studies have shown that the conduction axis can be extremely close to the septal crest. In one phase-contrast computed tomography study, the penetrating bundle was located at a median distance of approximately 1.43 mm from the septal crest, and the non-branching bundle was approximately 1.10 mm from the RV endocardium [4]. These measurements reinforce the surgical principle that even small deviations in suture depth or location can be clinically significant.

3. VSD With Outlet Extension

In a perimembranous VSD with outlet extension, the defect extends toward the right ventricular outflow tract. The outlet margin becomes more relevant, and the relationship between the RBB and the trabecula septomarginalis becomes particularly important.

In this morphology, the AV node gives rise to the penetrating bundle, which enters the septum in the usual region. The conduction axis then courses along the defect margin, but the RBB does not necessarily emerge posterior to the medial papillary muscle as in the normal heart. Instead, the RBB may exit on the RV septal surface anterior to the medial papillary muscle [1].

A key anatomical structure is the posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis. In outlet extension, this posterior limb may cover the branching bundle, the bifurcating bundle, and the base of the RBB. This muscular covering can shift the visible course of the RBB and bring it close to the outlet-side margin of the defect [1, 5].

Surgical interpretation

In outlet extension, the surgeon should not assume that the outlet margin is free of conduction risk. Although some anatomic studies suggest that the conduction axis may remain separated from the defect edge by muscular tissue, the relationship is modified by the morphology of the trabecula septomarginalis [5].

Key points:

• The RBB may emerge anterior to the medial papillary muscle.
• The posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis may cover the RBB base.
• The RBB may course close to the outlet margin.
• The visible medial papillary muscle may not fully define the conduction pathway.
• Deep sutures near the outlet-side muscular rim should be avoided unless the local anatomy is clearly understood.

In practical terms, the surgeon must evaluate whether the posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis is well developed, deficient, or displaced. This determines whether the conduction axis is protected by muscle or exposed near the surgical field [5].

4. VSD With Inlet Extension

In a perimembranous VSD with inlet extension, the defect extends toward the inlet septum and atrioventricular valve region. This morphology creates a different conduction risk.

The AV node and penetrating bundle remain closely related to the central fibrous body, but the subsequent course of the conduction axis is displaced toward the inlet-side margin of the defect. As a result, the RBB may run directly along the VSD edge rather than emerging in its usual relationship to the muscle of Lancisi [1, 5].

This is the setting in which the medial papillary muscle becomes an unreliable landmark. In the normal heart, the muscle of Lancisi helps orient the expected emergence of the RBB. In inlet extension, however, the RBB may be displaced toward the inlet-side defect rim, and its relationship to the medial papillary muscle may no longer predict a safe suture zone [1].

Surgical interpretation

In inlet extension, the inlet-side margin of the VSD should be treated as a high-risk zone for conduction injury.

Important points:

• The RBB may be displaced toward the inlet-side VSD edge.
• The RBB may run immediately adjacent to the defect margin.
• The medial papillary muscle may not reliably indicate the RBB location.
• Sutures along the inlet-side margin should be shallow and carefully placed.
• The surgeon should avoid incorporating excessive septal myocardium near the AV conduction axis.

The practical message is that inlet extension requires particular caution because the conduction tissue may be closer to the surgeon’s suture line than expected [5].

5. Role of the Trabecula Septomarginalis

The trabecula septomarginalis is not merely a trabecular structure of the RV. It is a key modifier of the surgical relationship between the VSD and the conduction axis.

The posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis may cover or partially cover the conduction axis. When it is well developed, it can place muscular tissue between the VSD margin and the conduction axis. When it is deficient, the branching bundle or RBB may become more superficial and vulnerable [5].

This concept is particularly important in outlet-type defects. The conduction bundle may appear protected when the posterior limb is well developed, but it may become exposed when the posterior limb is thin, deficient, or abnormally configured. Therefore, the anatomy of the trabecula septomarginalis should be inspected during repair, rather than assumed.

From a surgical perspective, the trabecula septomarginalis provides three important pieces of information:

1. It helps predict where the RBB may surface.
2. It modifies the relationship between the VSD rim and the conduction bundle.
3. It identifies areas where deep sutures may endanger the conduction axis.

High-resolution imaging data also support this concept: the caudal limb of the septomarginal trabeculation can be located very close to the RBB, emphasizing the need to avoid indiscriminate suture placement in the valley between the limbs of the trabecula septomarginalis [4].

6. Medial Papillary Muscle: Useful Landmark, but Not Always Reliable

The medial papillary muscle, or muscle of Lancisi, is frequently used as an intraoperative landmark. In the normal heart, the RBB typically emerges posterior to this structure. In some VSD morphologies, however, this relationship changes.

Histological studies have shown that the relationship between the RBB and papillary muscles varies according to the type of VSD and the development of the septal structures [6]. In defects not related to conal septal maldevelopment, the RBB may pass beneath or slightly anterior to accessory papillary muscles and posterior to the medial papillary muscle. In defects associated with maldevelopment of the outlet septum, such as tetralogy of Fallot, the RBB may course anterior to the medial papillary muscle [6, 7].

Thus, the medial papillary muscle is best regarded as a context-dependent landmark.

It may be helpful when:

• The anatomy is close to normal.
• The posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis is well formed.
• The defect does not extend significantly toward the inlet.

It may be misleading when:

• The VSD has inlet extension.
• The posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis is abnormal.
• The defect is associated with conal or outlet septal maldevelopment.
• The RBB has shifted toward the VSD edge.

7. Comparison of Conduction Risk by Morphology

This comparison emphasizes that the conduction axis must be interpreted according to the three-dimensional morphology of the defect rather than the label “perimembranous VSD” alone.

8. Practical Surgical Principles for VSD Closure

Safe VSD closure requires a structured assessment of the conduction axis before sutures are placed.

8.1 Identify the type of VSD extension

The surgeon should first determine whether the defect extends toward the:

• Outlet septum
• Inlet septum
• Trabecular septum
• Multiple components

This step predicts the likely shift of the conduction axis.

8.2 Inspect the trabecula septomarginalis

The posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis should be evaluated carefully. A well-developed posterior limb may provide muscular coverage over the conduction axis. A deficient posterior limb may allow the conduction axis to surface more directly near the VSD margin [5].

8.3 Do not rely on a single landmark

The medial papillary muscle is useful, but not sufficient. In particular, it may be unreliable in inlet extension, where the RBB can run close to the inlet-side edge of the VSD [1].

8.4 Avoid deep bites in high-risk regions

High-risk regions include:

• Posteroinferior margin of perimembranous VSD
• Inlet-side edge in inlet extension
• Valley between the limbs of the trabecula septomarginalis
• Defect margins with abnormal tricuspid leaflet attachments
• Outlet margin in cases with conal septal maldevelopment

8.5 Use the patch to protect the conduction axis

When necessary, the patch can be seated slightly away from the conduction tissue. Sutures may be placed through fibrous tissue, tricuspid valve tissue, or carefully selected superficial septal tissue, depending on the anatomy.

The goal is not simply complete closure. The goal is complete closure without conduction injury.

9. Modern Perspective: From Landmark-Based Surgery to Anatomy-Based Prediction

Traditional VSD closure relies heavily on surgical landmarks. However, newer anatomical reviews and high-resolution imaging studies emphasize that the conduction axis is highly dependent on defect morphology [1, 4].

This shifts the surgical mindset from:

“Where is the conduction tissue usually located?”

to:

“How has this specific VSD morphology displaced the conduction axis?”

This approach is especially important in complex VSDs, tetralogy of Fallot, malalignment defects, inlet extension, and defects with abnormal trabecula septomarginalis morphology.

A modern surgical strategy should combine:

1. Morphologic classification of the VSD
2. Prediction of the conduction axis
3. Recognition of local landmarks
4. Controlled suture depth
5. Avoidance of high-risk zones
6. Continuous reassessment during patch placement

10. Take-Home Message

The atrioventricular conduction axis in perimembranous VSD is not static. Its course is modified by the direction of VSD extension and by the configuration of the trabecula septomarginalis.

In the normal heart, the RBB usually emerges posterior to the muscle of Lancisi.

In perimembranous VSD with outlet extension, the RBB may course anterior to the medial papillary muscle and may be covered by the posterior limb of the trabecula septomarginalis.

In perimembranous VSD with inlet extension, the RBB may be displaced toward the inlet-side edge of the defect, making the medial papillary muscle an unreliable landmark.

Therefore, safe VSD closure requires a three-dimensional understanding of the conduction axis, the VSD margin, the trabecula septomarginalis, the medial papillary muscle, and the tricuspid valve apparatus.

The central surgical principle is:

Do not close a VSD by following a fixed landmark. Close it by predicting the conduction axis from the morphology of the defect.

References

[1] Yoneyama F, Kato H, Mathis BJ, Suetsugu F, Hiramatsu Y. Right bundle branch in ventricular septal defects. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;67(4):ezaf105.

[2] Anderson RH, Sánchez-Quintana D, Cook AC. Avoiding damage to the atrioventricular conduction axis during surgical closure of ventricular septal defects. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;67(7):ezaf154.

[3] Latham RA, Anderson RH. Anatomical variations in atrioventricular conduction system with reference to ventricular septal defects. Br Heart J. 1972;34(2):185-190.

[4] Yoshitake S, Kaneko Y, Morita K, Hoshino M, Oshima Y, Takahashi M, et al. Visualization and quantification of the atrioventricular conduction axis in hearts with ventricular septal defect using phase contrast computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(2):490-496.

[5] Kurosawa H, Becker AE. Modification of the precise relationship of the atrioventricular conduction bundle to the margins of the ventricular septal defects by the trabecula septomarginalis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;87(4):605-615.

[6] Tamiya T, Yamashiro T, Matsumoto T, Ogoshi S, Seguchi H. A histological study of surgical landmarks for the specialized atrioventricular conduction system, with particular reference to the papillary muscle. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40(6):599-605.

[7] Dickinson DF, Wilkinson JL, Smith A, Hamilton DI, Anderson RH. Variations in the morphology of the ventricular septal defect and disposition of the atrioventricular conduction tissues in tetralogy of Fallot. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;30(5):243-249.

[8] Ueda M, Becker AE. Morphological characteristics of perimembranous ventricular septal defects and their surgical significance. Int J Cardiol. 1985;8(2):149-161.